4.6 Review

Tree disagreement: Measuring and testing incongruence in phylogenies

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 86-102

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.08.008

Keywords

ILD; Kishino-Hasegawa; Shimodaira-Hasegawa; SOWH; Templeton; LILD; Rodrigo test; symmetric difference; total evidence; WCI; tadA; cpa; rpoB; Actinobacillus; Vibrio; Caulobacter; Pasteurella; Mannheimia; Yersinia; Erwinia

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [5R01 GM062351-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The branching patterns of phylogenetic trees often disagree even when they have been constructed using different portions of the same data. This phylogenetic discord (incongruence) can be explained by real differences in evolutionary process or history, but also may be due simply to random chance or sampling error. Techniques for measuring and testing the significance of phylogenetic incongruence are used widely in systematic biology, and are necessary when considering genome-scale datasets composed of multiple genes that may or may not have different histories. They are also applicable wherever tree algorithms are used for ordering and interpreting data (e.g., DNA microarrays). Here, I review the different incongruence tests and use them to test the phylogenetic discord of a potentially mobile genetic element (the widespread colonization Island) in the gamma-proteobacteria. I then consider how incongruence tests may be used as a starting point for phylogenetic analysis that accounts for horizontal transfer and duplication events as explanations for homoplasy. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available