Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages 208-215Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.010
Keywords
health status indicators; SF36((R)); crosscultural; American Indian; reliability; factor analysis
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: To increase our understanding of the psychometric characteristics and factor structure of the SF36 (R) in older American Indian populations. Methods: Between 1993 and 1995, SF36 (R) data were collected from 3,488 Phase 11 participants of the Strong Heart Study (SHS) between the ages of 48 and 81. Comparison data were provided by an age- and gender-matched sample (n = 695) from the National Survey of Functional Health Status (NSFHS) conducted in 1989 and 1990. Results: Generally, the basic psychometric analyses showed that the SF36 (R) performed adequately in these older American Indians. Exploratory factor analyses indicated that a one-factor model best fit the data for both older groups. On the other hand, confirmatory factor analyses showed that a two-factor model with correlated factors provided a superior fit to the data than a one-factor model. An assumption of equivalent factor loadings for the SHS and NSFHS groups was untenable. Conclusion: These analyses demonstrate that use of summary scores assuming a differentiated physical/mental functioning structure is likely improper in at least some populations. The SF36 (R) provides an important opportunity to understand cultural differences in the conceptualization and measurement of health-related quality of life. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available