4.6 Article

Deletion of TLR3 alters the pulmonary immune environment and mucus production during respiratory syncytial virus infection

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 176, Issue 3, Pages 1937-1942

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.3.1937

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The detection of a viral infection by pattern recognition receptors (PAMPs) is an integral part of antiviral immunity. In these studies we have investigated the role of TLR3, which recognizes dsRNA, in Respiratory Syncytial virus (RSV) infection using B6 background mice with a TLR3 deletion. Although we observed no changes in viral growth, we did find that TLR3(-/-) mice demonstrated significant increases in mucus production in the airways of RSV-infected mice. The qualitative assessment was observed by examining differentially stained lungs, followed by immunohistochemical staining for gob5, a mucus-associated protein. The histopathologic observations were verified using quantitative gene expression analyses examining gob5 gene expression. Changes in pulmonary mucus production were accompanied by an increase in pulmonary IL-13 as well as IL-5 expression and eosinophils in the airways of TLR3(-/-) mice. Examining leukocytes in the airway indicated an accumulation of eosinophils in TLR3(-/-) mice, but not wild-type mice, after RSV infection. Isolated lung draining lymph node cells from TLR3(-/-) mice produced significant increases in Th2-type cytokines, IL-5, and IL-13, compared with wild-type TLR3(+/+) mice only after RSV infection. To demonstrate a causative link, we depleted TLR3(-/-) mice of IL-13 during RSV infection and found that mucus and gob5 expression in the lungs was attenuated. Together, these studies highlight that although TLR3 may not be required for viral clearance, it is necessary to maintain the proper immune environment in the lung to avoid developing pathologic symptoms of disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available