4.6 Article

Genetic conservation of insular populations of monterey pine (Pinus radiata d. Don)

Journal

BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 779-798

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-004-1066-4

Keywords

Baja California; Cedros Island; conifer; ex situ conservation; genetic bottleneck; Guadalupe Island; in situ conservation; island biota

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monterey pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) has only five extant native populations: three disjunct populations along the coast of California, USA and two on Mexican islands. All populations have been influenced by human activity, but the island populations in particular have been affected by introduced biota. On Guadalupe Island, the pine population has suffered drastically from overgrazing by introduced goats. We visited both island populations and described their status, took measurements, and made seed collections. We counted approximately 200 mature pine trees and virtually no seedlings on Guadalupe Island: a reduction of approximately half the population in the last 50 years. The trees are all large (mean diameter of 144 cm) -considerably larger than trees from the other four populations - and arguably near the end of their natural lifespan. The population on Cedros Island is much more robust, with thousands of trees. None sampled were as large as those on Guadalupe Island (mean diameter of 20 cm) and many groves were young and even-aged - presumably the consequence of natural regeneration after a recent fire. Tissue samples from trees on both islands did not show evidence of infection from the pitch canker pathogen, Fusarium circinatum, that has caused significant mortality in the three mainland populations. Caution is recommended in any restoration activity for the Guadalupe Island pines. Inbreeding levels could indicate the need for some planting or seeding intervention but there are also risks associated with this. Natural regeneration - after goat removal - is preferred.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available