4.2 Article

In vivo comparison of suburethral sling materials

Journal

INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 106-110

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-005-1320-7

Keywords

suburethral sling; urinary incontinence; polypropylene; graft healing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In vivo tissue responses were compared for three commercially available polypropylene suburethral slings that differ markedly in fabric structure and in size of resulting interstices and pores. All three elicited the same basic inflammatory response; however, individual fabric structures produced distinct differences in tissue formation within each mesh. The presence of numerous, closely spaced, small diameter filaments prevented formation of extensive fibrous connective tissue within two slings (ObTape and IVS Tunneller mesh). The much larger diameter monofilament and open knit structure of the Monarc sling permitted the most extensive fibrous tissue integration. These differences may be of interest to physicians considering clinical use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available