4.5 Article

An aggressive systematic strategy for acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by severe pneumonia after renal transplantation

Journal

TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 110-116

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2005.00245.x

Keywords

acute respiratory distress syndrome; continuous renal replacement treatment; immune function; kidney transplantation; pneumonia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by pneumonia after renal transplantation was usually associated with overimmunosuppression and high mortality rate. We evaluated the efficacy of an aggressive systemic protocol including strategies improving body's immune function. Twenty-one recipients were enrolled in this study. Patients were subjected to a protocol including (i) withdrawal of most immunosuppressants, (ii) early use of immunoenhancers and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), (iii) reasonable administration of antibiotic regimen, (iv) prompt mechanical ventilating strategy, and (v) adequate nutrition. Immunosuppressants were adjusted according to the value of CD4+, CD8+T lymphocytes in peripheral blood. CRRT was conducted at once when patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), regardless the graft function. Thirteen (62%) survived and eight died finally. This is a high survival rate for this kind of patients. Eighteen patients had received thymosin treatment. All patients who survived experienced renal allograft dysfunction during CRRT, but when CRRT stopped, the function of all grafts gradually recovered. No acute rejection episodes were documented during the treatment. The aggressive systemic protocol including strategies improving the body's immune function and CRRT can improve the outcome of patients with ARDS after renal transplantation. The count of CD4+, CD8+T lymphocytes of peripheral blood is useful in the adjustment of immunosuppressants and the prediction of patient outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available