4.7 Article

Expression of the Bax inhibitor-1 gene in pulmonary adenocarcinoma

Journal

CANCER
Volume 106, Issue 3, Pages 648-653

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21639

Keywords

bronchioloalveolar carcinoma; apoptosis; Bcl-2; Bax; p53; Bax inhibitor-1

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND. The regulation of programmed cell death, or apoptosis, is crucial for normal development and for the maintenance of homeostasis. It has been shown that the novel antiapoptotic protein Bax inhibitor-1 (BI-1) represents a new type of regulator of cell death pathways controlled by Bcl-2 and Bax. METHODS. Surgically resected lung specimens were obtained from 32 patients with peripheral adenocarcinomas, and BI-1 gene expression was examined and compared with expression of the p53, bcl-2 and Bax genes. RESULTS. Fourteen of 32 tumors (43.8%) were positive for BI-1 gene expression by in situ hybridization. BI-1 gene expression in tumor specimens was significantly higher in adenocarcinomas with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) and in adenocarcinomas of mixed subtypes with bronchioloalveolar spreading (14 of 17 tumors; 82.4%) than in carcinomas without it spreading. Patients who had BI-1-positive adenocarcinoma showed a relatively favorable prognosis compared with patients who had BI-1-negative adenocarcinoma. Eleven of 32 tumors (34.4%) were positive for the p53 protein, only 1 of 32 tumors (3.1%) was positive for the Bcl-2 protein, and 26 of 32 tumors (81.3%) were positive for the Bax protein. Protein expressions of p53, Bcl-2, and Bax, as detected by immunohistochemistry, were not associated with BI-1 gene expression. CONCLUSIONS. BI-1 gene expression was restricted to tumor cells with lepidic growth and was a prognostic factor for peripheral-type adenocarcinoma. It is believed that BI-1 gene expression is conserved evolutionarily and may act as a key regulator of the apoptotic pathway in BAC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available