4.2 Article

Polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and the risk of prostate cancer:: a nested case-control study

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 46-50

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.cej.0000186640.19872.4d

Keywords

methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase; MTHFR 677C -> T; MTHFR 1298A -> C; folate; one-carbon metabolism; prostatic neoplasm

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been proposed that folate and polymorphisms of the enzyme methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), which regulates influx of folate from DNA synthesis and repair to methylation reactions, are involved in the aetiology of cancer. To relate the MTHFR 677C -> T and 1298A -> C polymorphisms to the risk of prostate cancer, taking into consideration prospective plasma levels of folate, vitamin B-12 and homocysteine. The design was a case-control study of 223 prostate cancer cases and 435 matched controls nested within the population-based Northern Sweden Health and Disease Cohort. Neither the MTHFR 677C -> T nor the MTHFR 1298A -> C polymorphism was statistically significantly associated with the risk of prostate cancer in univariate analysis by conditional logistic regression. After adjustment for MTHFR 1298A -> C, plasma folate, vitamin B-12, homocysteine, body mass index and smoking, the odds ratios were, for the 677 CT genotype, 1.52 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-2.26], and for TT, 0.91 (95% CI 0.41-2.04). Our previously reported observation of a possible increase in the risk of prostate cancer at high plasma folate levels was attributable in this study to subjects having the MTHFR 677C -> T polymorphism. We found that the MTHFR 677C -> T polymorphism is not likely to have a major role in the development of prostate cancer, although it may possibly increase the risk in combination with high plasma folate levels. Further investigation in larger studies is warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available