4.3 Article

The quantitative analysis of thin specimens:: a review of progress from the Cliff-Lorimer to the new ζ-factor methods

Journal

JOURNAL OF MICROSCOPY
Volume 221, Issue -, Pages 89-109

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01549.x

Keywords

absorption correction; Cliff-Lorimer ratio technique; detector efficiency; light-element analysis; minimum detectable mass; minimum mass fraction; pure-element thin-film standard; quantitative thin-film X-ray analysis; spatial resolution; thickness determination; zeta (zeta)-factor method

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new quantitative thin-film X-ray analysis procedure termed the zeta-factor method is proposed. This new zeta-factor method overcomes the two major limitations of the conventional Cliff-Lorimer method for quantification: (1) use of pure-element rather than multielement, thin-specimen standards and (2) built-in X-ray absorption correction with simultaneous thickness determination. Combined with a universal, standard, thin specimen. a series of zeta-factors covering a significant fraction of the periodic table can be estimated. This zeta-factor estimation can also provide information about both the detector efficiency and the micro scope-detector interface system. Light-element analysis can also be performed more easily because of the built-in absorption correction. Additionally, the new zeta-factor method has several advantages over the Cliff-Lorimer ratio method because information on the specimen thickness at the individual analysis points is produced simultaneously with compositions, thus permitting concurrent determination of the spatial resolution and the analytical sensitivity In this Work. details of the zeta-factor method and how it improves on the Cliff-Lorimer approach are demonstrated, along With several applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available