4.7 Article

Isolation and physiological characterization of the pentachlorophenol degrading bacterium Sphingomonas chlorophenolica

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 62, Issue 5, Pages 709-714

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.05.012

Keywords

biodegradation; pentachlorophenol; Sphingomonas chlorophenolica; biolog; growth physiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many chlorophenols tend to persist in the environment, and they may become public health hazards. Among chlorophenols, pentachlorophenol (PCP) is a priority pollutant that has been used widely as a general biocide in commercial wood treatment. Owing to the rapid industrial growth, serious soil and water pollutions by chlorophenols has been reported in Taiwan. In this study, 10 indigenous PCP-degrading bacterial strains were isolated from a PCP-degrading mixed culture, and the potential of both the pure and mixed cultures for PCP degradation compared. Moreover, the physiological characteristics and optimum growth conditions of the PCP-degrading bacteria were investigated. One of the isolated bacterial strains with good potential for PCP degradation was characterized and identified as Sphingomonas chlorophenolica by 16S rDNA gene analysis. The result of the optimum growth temperatures revealed that this organism was a mesophile. The optimum pH for PCP removal by S. chlorophenolica was between 6.9 and 7.6. Increase in concentration of PCP has a negative effect on the biodegradation potential of S. chlorophenolica and PCP concentration above 600 mg l(-1) was inhibitory to its growth. The results of this study indicate that this S. chlorophenolica strain has a better potential for PCP degradation compared to the enriched mixed culture. The physiological characterization of the isolates also indicates the possible application of this strain for bioremediation of sites contaminated with PCP. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available