4.7 Article

XMM-Newton view of PKS 2155-304: Hardness ratio and cross-correlation analysis of epic pn observations

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 637, Issue 2, Pages 699-710

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/498498

Keywords

BL Lacertae objects : general; BL Lacertae objects : individual (PKS 2155-304) galaxies : active; methods : data analysis; X-rays : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With currently available XMM- Newton EPIC pn observations spanned over about 3 yr, we present a detailed spectral and temporal variability of the 0.2 - 10 keV X- ray emission from the X- ray- bright BL Lac object PKS 2155 - 304. The spectral variability is examined with a model- independent hardness ratio method. We find that the spectral evolution of the source follows the light curves well, indicating that the spectra harden when the fluxes increase. The plots of hardness ratios versus count rates show that the spectral changes are particularly significant during flares. The cross- correlation functions ( CCFs) show that the light curves in the different energy bands are well correlated at different time lags. The CCF peaks ( i. e., the maximum correlation coefficients) tend to become smaller with larger energy differences, and the variabilities in the different energy bands are more correlated for the flares than for the other cases. In most cases the higher energy band variations lead the lower energy band, but in two cases we observed the opposite behavior, that the lower energy variability possibly leads the higher energy variability. The time lags increase with the energy differences between the two cross- correlated light curves. The maximum lag is found to be up to about 1 hr, supporting the findings obtained with previous low Earth orbit X- ray missions. We discuss our results in the context of the particle acceleration, cooling, and light- crossing timescales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available