4.2 Article

Partial support from a nonreplication: Comment on Roma, Silberberg, Ruggiero, and Suomi (2006)

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 120, Issue 1, Pages 74-75

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC/EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.120.1.74

Keywords

inequity; inequity aversion; capuchin monkeys; Cebus apella

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A purported replication by P. G. Roma, A. Silberberg, A. M. Ruggiero, and S. J. Suomi (2006) of the authors' previous study (S. F. Brosnan & F. B. M. de Waal, 2003) claims to contradict their finding that capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) refuse to exchange with an experimenter if their partner receives a superior reward. Roma et al. used no exchange task, however, or any other task. Roma et al. offered frustration as explanation of their findings, yet failed to statistically prove that the effect of frustration is stronger than that of inequity. They also misrepresented the dependent measure of the authors' study. Reanalysis of the authors' own data indicated no role of frustration, that is, no effect of previous experience with a superior reward. The authors conclude that Roma et al.'s study is not a replication and does not disprove the authors' findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available