4.3 Article

Impaired DNA double strand break repair in cells from Nijmegen breakage syndrome patients

Journal

DNA REPAIR
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 251-257

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.10.004

Keywords

non-homolopus end-joining; homologous recombination; NBS; microhomology; double strand break repair; single strand annealing

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01HL54785, R01HL52725] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01DK43889] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIEHS NIH HHS [R01ES09519] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nijmegen breakage syndrome, caused by mutations in the NBS1 gene, is an autosomal recessive chromosomal instability disorder characterized by cancer predisposition. Cells isolated from Nijmegen breakage syndrome patients display increased levels of spontaneous chromosome aberrations and sensitivity to ionizing radiation. Here, we have investigated DNA double strand break repair pathways of homologous recombination, including single strand annealing, and non-homologous end-joining in Nijmegen breakage syndrome patient cells. We used recently developed GFP-YFP-based plasmid substrates to measure the efficiency of DNA double strand break repair. Both single strand annealing and non-homologous end-joining processes were markedly impaired in NBS1-deficient cells, and repair proficiency was restored upon re-introduction of full length NBS1 cDNA. Despite the observed defects in the repair efficiency, no apparent differences in homologous recombination or non-homologous end-joining effector proteins RAD51, KU70, KU86, or DNA-PKCS were observed. Furthermore, comparative analysis of junction sequences of plasmids recovered from NBS1-deficient and NBS1-complemented cells revealed increased dependence on microhomology-mediated end-joining DNA repair process in NBS1-complemented cells. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available