4.5 Article

Physical properties of the Mars Exploration Rover landing sites as inferred from Mini-TES-derived thermal inertia

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS
Volume 111, Issue E2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2005JE002583

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

[1] The Miniature Thermal Emission Spectrometer (Mini-TES) on board the two Mars Exploration Rovers provides the first opportunity to observe thermal properties from the Martian surface, relate these properties to orbital data, and perform soil conductivity experiments under Martian conditions. The thermal inertias of soils, bedforms, and rock at each landing site were derived to quantify the physical properties of these features and understand geologic processes occurring at these localities. The thermal inertia for the Gusev plains rock target Bonneville Beacon ( similar to 1200 J m(-2) K-1 s(-1/2)) is consistent with a dense, basaltic rock, but the rocks at the Columbia Hills have a lower thermal inertia ( similar to 620 J m(-2) K-1 s(-1/2)), suggesting that they have a volcaniclasic origin. Bedforms on the floors of craters at both landing sites have thermal inertias of 200 J m(-2) K-1 s(-1/2), consistent with a particle diameter of similar to 160 mu m. This diameter is comparable to the most easily moved grain size in the current atmosphere on Mars, suggesting that these bedforms may have formed under current atmospheric conditions. Along the Meridiani plains, the thermal inertia is lower than that derived from TES and Thermal Emission Imaging System (THEMIS) orbital data. This discrepancy is not well understood. Mini-TES-derived thermal inertias at Gusev along a similar to 2.5 km traverse follow trends in thermal inertia measured from orbit with TES and THEMIS. However, along the traverse, there are variability and mixing of particle sizes that are not resolved in the orbital thermal inertia data due to meter-scale processes that are not identifiable at larger scales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available