4.4 Article

Dopamine, oxytocin, and vasopressin receptor binding in the medial prefrontal cortex of monogamous and promiscuous voles

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 394, Issue 2, Pages 146-151

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.10.019

Keywords

dopamine; neuropeptides; receptors; mPFC; monogamy

Categories

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD40722] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [DA19627] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [MH58616] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [NS07437] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Comparisons between monogamous and promiscuous vole species have proven useful in examining neurobiological mechanisms underlying social attachment. Reward processing is important for social attachment, and the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) exerts a direct influence on reward pathways. Dopamine (DA), oxytocin (OT), and arginine vasopressin (AVP) all have been implicated in the regulation of social attachment in monogamous voles. Therefore, we used radiolabeled ligands to examine dopamine D-1- and D-2-like, OT, and AVP V-1a receptor binding densities in the mPFC of monogamous and promiscuous voles. Species differences were found; monogamous voles had higher densities of D-2-like and OT receptor binding and lower densities of D-1-like and V1(a) receptor binding than did promiscuous voles. Sex differences also were found; females had higher densities of OT receptor binding but lower densities of V-1a receptor binding than did males in both species. Further, the laminar distribution of receptor binding indicates the possibility of an interaction between DA and OT systems in the mPFC in the regulation of social attachment. Differences in D-1- and D-2-like receptor binding between species are discussed in terms of how they might modulate cortical activity and subsequent DA release in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc). (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available