4.7 Article

Hepatocellular carcinoma caused by iron overload: A possible mechanism of direct hepatocarcinogenicity

Journal

TOXICOLOGY
Volume 219, Issue 1-3, Pages 41-52

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2005.11.006

Keywords

ferrocene; Wistar albino rats; reactive oxygen species; oxidative damage; lipid peroxidation; hereditary haemochromatosis; African dietary iron overload; iron-free neoplastic foci

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/aims: Excess hepatic iron may be both directly and indirectly carcinogenic. The generation of reactive oxygen species and the resulting oxidative damage induced by free hepatic iron is directly hepatocarcinogenic. Methods: Sixty male Wistar albino rats were iron-loaded by ferrocene supplementation of their diet. Biochemical parameters of oxidative damage and lipid peroxidation, DNA unwinding and strand breaks. and the Ames Mutagenesis Test were measured at 4 monthly intervals and correlated with the degree of hepatic iron overload, the presence of iron-free preneoplastic foci in the liver., and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in comparison with 60 control rats. Results: Levels of lipid hydroperoxides, malonaldehyde, 8-isoprostane and 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine increased, reaching peak concentrations at 20-24 months, and correlating with an increase in the rate of DNA unwinding, strand breaks, and positive Ames Tests. Iron-free neoplastic foci became evident at 16 months and thereafter increased in number. Preneoplastic foci were present in five of eight rats remaining at 32 months and HCC had developed in one of the five. Conclusions: Our findings are compatible with the hypothesis that the direct hepatocarcinogenic effect of free iron is mediated by the generation of oxygen reactive species and oxidative damage that are mutagenic and carcinogenic. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available