4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Natriuretic peptides differentially attenuate thrombin-induced barrier dysfunction in pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
Volume 312, Issue 4, Pages 401-410

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.11.001

Keywords

natriuretic peptides; endothelium; RhoA GTPase; signal transduction; barrier function; pulmonary edema

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R25 HL088992, HL67795] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous studies have described a protective effect of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) against agonist-induced permeability in endothelial cells derived from various vascular beds. In the current study, we assessed the effects of the three natriuretic peptides on thrombin-induced barrier dysfunction in rat lung microvascular endothelial cells (LMVEC). Both ANP and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) attenuated the effect of thrombin on increased endothelial monolayer permeability and significantly enhanced the rate of barrier restoration. C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) had no effect on the degree of thrombin-induced monolayer permeability, but did enhance the restoration of the endothelial barrier, similar to ANP and BNP. In contrast, the non-guanylyl cyclase-linked natriuretic peptide receptor specific ligand, cyclic-atrial natriuretic factor (c-ANF), delayed the rate of barrier restoration following exposure to thrombin. All three natriuretic peptides promoted cGMP production in the endothelial cells; however, 8-bromo-cGMP alone did not significantly affect thrombin modulation of endothelial barrier function. ANP and BNP, but not CNP or c-ANF, blunted thrombin-induced RhoA GTPase activation. We conclude that ANP and BNP protect against thrombin-induced barrier dysfunction in the pulmonary microcirculation by a cGMP-independent mechanism, possibly by attenuation of RhoA activation. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available