4.4 Article

Metastasis suppressor gene Raf kinase inhibitor protein (RKIP) is a novel prognostic marker in prostate cancer

Journal

PROSTATE
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages 248-256

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pros.20319

Keywords

prognostic marker; RKIP; prostate cancer; metastasis suppressor gene; tissue microarray

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01-CA098513, 1 P50 CA69568] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND. Diminished expression of Raf kinase inhibitor protein (RKIP), an inhibitor of the Raf signaling cascade, promotes prostate cancer (PCa) metastasis in a murine model, suggesting that it is a metastasis suppressor gene. However, the prognostic significance of RKIP expression and its association with metastasis in PCa patients is unknown. METHODS. To investigate RKIP protein expression is a prognostic marker in PCa we performed immunohistochemical staining for RKIP expression in tissue microarrays consisting of 758 non-neoplastic prostate tissues, primary tumors and metastases from 134 PCa patients. The Cox proportional-hazards model was used to adjust for covariates including Gleason score, tumor volume, tumor weight, clinical stage, digital rectal exam findings, serum PSA level and surgical margins. RESULTS. RKIP expression was low in approximately 5%, 48%, and 89% of non-neoplastic prostate, primary tumors and metastases, respectively. Low RKIP expression in primary tumors was a strong positive predictive factor for PCa recurrence based on PSA levels. In patients whose primary tumors expressed high RKIP levels, the 7-year PSA recurrence rate was < 10%; whereas in patients with tumors with low RKIP expression the recurrence rate was 50% (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed RKIP was an independent prognostic factor (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION. In contrast to increased expression of pro-tumorigenic genes, these results demonstrate decreased protein expression of a gene, for example, RKIP, can serve as a prognostic marker in PCa patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available