4.7 Article

Enzymatic rotating biosensor for cysteine and glutathione determination in a FIA system

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages 1343-1352

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2005.07.060

Keywords

cysteine; glutathione; glassy carbon; biosensor; peroxidase; catechol; FIA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The high sensitivity that can be attained using an enzymatic system and mediated by catechols has been verified by on-line interfacing of a rotating biosensor and continuous flow/stopped-flow/continuous-flow processing. Horseradish peroxidase, HRP, [EC 1.11.1.7], immobilized on a rotating disk, in presence of hydrogen peroxide catalyzed the oxidation of catechols, whose back electrochemical reduction was detected on glassy carbon electrode surface at -150 mV Thus, when L-cysteine (Cys) or glutathione (GSH) was added to the solution, these thick containing compounds participate in Michael addition reactions with catechols to form the corresponding thioquinone derivatives, decreasing the peak current obtained proportionally to the increase of its concentration. Cys was used as the model thiol-containing compound for the study. The highest response for Cys was obtained around pH 7. This method could be used to determine Cys concentration in the range 0.05-90 mu M (r = 0.998) and GSH concentration in the range 0.04-90 mu M (r = 0.999). The determination of Cys and GSH were possible with a limit of detection of 0.7 and 0.3 nM, respectively, in the processing of as many as 25 samples per hour. Current response of the HRP-rotating biosensor is not affected by the oxidized form of GSH and Cys (glutathione disulfide, GSSG, and L-cystine, respectively), by sulfur-containing and alkyl-amino compounds such as methionine and lysine, respectively. The interferences from easily oxidizable species such as ascorbic acid and uric acid are lowest. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available