4.7 Article

Responses of boreal carabid beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) to clear-cutting and top-soil preparation

Journal

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 222, Issue 1-3, Pages 182-190

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.013

Keywords

carabidae; forestry; harrowing; logging; soil scarification

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Today, forestry is the most important disturbance force in Fennoscandian boreal forests, having remarkably altered fauna and flora in this biome. However, since the late 1900s, forest-management practices have been modified to better consider biodiversity while harvesting timber. For example, green-tree retention, gap felling, and lighter top-soil preparation methods (harrowing) have been introduced, but little is known about the ecological effects of these changes. We sampled carabid beetles in seven clear-cut stands that were subsequently harrowed. We studied the effects of (1) clear-cut size by comparing carabid catches of small gaps (ca. 0.16 ha) with those of larger clear-cuts (ca. 2 ha), and (2) microsite type within stands by comparing carabid catches of strips of bare soil to those of drifted humus (adjacent to bare-soil strips) and undisturbed (not scarified) forest floor. We detected only slight effects of clear-cut size on the assemblage structure, but clearer differences at species and ecological-group levels among the three compared micro-site types. The catches of forest carabids, and flightless carabids, were higher in the undisturbed micro-sites as compared to bare-soil ones, whereas open-habitat carabids showed the opposite abundance pattern. The variation among study blocks, and logging per se (compared to un-logged mature stands), had more pronounced effects on carabid assemblage structure than either clear-cut size or micro-site. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available