4.6 Article

Impaired long-term habituation is dissociated from increased locomotor activity after sensorimotor cortex compression

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 167, Issue 1, Pages 9-22

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.06.048

Keywords

open-field; cognitive impairments; brain injury; hippocampal damage; thalamus; striatum; Fluoro-Jade

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Behavioural habituation to a novel environment is a simple form of learning in rodents. We Studied the habituation and locomotor activity (LMA) of Wistar rats subjected to unilateral, transient (30 min) extradural compression (EC of the right sensorimotor cortex. One group of rats was tested every 24 h during the first 5 days (D1-D5) post-EC. Two other groups were tested for the first time in the LMA boxes on D3 and D6 post-EC and their performance was compared with the group tested on D1 (activity in a novel environment). Total and center locomotion, vertical activity and time spent in the center of the LMA box were reduced on D1 post-EC and normalized by D2. The EC-induced motor paresis was undetectable on the rotarod by D2 and on the beam-walking by D3. Total locomotion, vertical activity and time spent in the center of EC-rats significantly increased from D1 to D3. EC caused neurodegeneration in the cortex, caudate putamen and thalamus as detected by Fluoro-Jade staining. The size of the cortical damage decreased from D2 to D5 in the medial and caudal regions of the compressed hemisphere, in accordance with recovery of motor function. LMA provided additional information in the follow-up of recovery from brain injury and habituation to the environment. Thus, long-term, inter-session habituation was impaired from D1 to D3 but dissociated front increased LMA intra-session on D3, when the motor deficits provoked by EC were already undetectable in the rotarod and beam-walking tests. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available