4.7 Article

Yield formation strategies of durum wheat landraces with distinct pattern of dispersal within the Mediterranean basin - I: Yield components

Journal

FIELD CROPS RESEARCH
Volume 95, Issue 2-3, Pages 194-205

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.02.009

Keywords

thousand-kernel weight; spike density; tillering; grains per spike; crop phenology

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was undertaken to ascertain whether the pattern of dispersal of durum wheat within the Mediterranean basin is associated with variation in phenology and yield formation strategies. A set of 52 durum wheat landraces, previously genetically characterized as been dispersed by the north or south of the Mediterranean region, were grown in three tainted sites in a dry-temperate region (Lleida, NE Spain), and crop phenology, yield and yield components were determined. Northern genotypes had a larger number of stems per unit area, but a lower percentage of fertile tillers and fewer grains per spike than southern landraces. Grain yield for the northern dispersal group was mainly related to variations in thousand-kernel weight, while the number of spikes per m(2) was the component most highly correlated with yield among southern genotypes. These contrasting yield formation strategies are probably a consequence of the different climates prevalent in the zones of adaptation, and likely conferred adaptive advantages to the genotypes of one or the other group. Our results suggest that gradual changes in yield components occurred during the movement of durum wheat from east to west through the north side of the Mediterranean basin. According to our results, the weight of grains and the number of spikes per unit area may be selection criteria to improve adaptation for the northern and the southern parts of the Mediterranean basin, respectively. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available