Journal
SCIENCE
Volume 311, Issue 5763, Pages 1020-1022Publisher
AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1121872
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- NIMH NIH HHS [MH12531] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Empirical research with nonhuman primates appears to support the view that causal reasoning is a key cognitive faculty that divides humans from animals. The claim is that animals approximate causal learning using associative processes. The present results cast doubt on that conclusion. Rats made causal inferences in a basic task that taps into core features of causal reasoning without requiring complex physical knowledge. They derived predictions of the outcomes of interventions after passive observational learning of different kinds of causal models. These competencies cannot be explained by current associative theories but are consistent with causal Bayes net theories.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available