4.6 Article

Targeted disruption of the blood-brain barrier with focused ultrasound: association with cavitation activity

Journal

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages 793-807

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/4/003

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [R33EB000705, R01EB003268] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acoustic emission was monitored during focused ultrasound exposures in conjunction with an ultrasound contrast agent (Optison((R))) in order to determine if cavitation activity is associated with the induction of blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD). Thirty-four locations were sonicated (frequency: 260 kHz) at targets 10 mm deep in rabbit brain (N = 9). The sonications were applied at peak pressure amplitudes ranging from 0.11 to 0.57 MPa (burst length: 10 ms; repetition frequency of 1 Hz; duration: 20 s). Acoustic emission was recorded with I focused passive cavitation detector. This emission was recorded at each location during sonications with and without Optison((R)). Detectable wideband acoustic emission was observed only at 0.40 and 0.57 MPa. BBBD was observed in contrast MR1 after sonication at 0.29-0.57 MPa. The appearance of small regions of extravasated erythrocytes appeared to be associated with this wideband emission signal. The results thus suggest that BBBD resulting from focused ultrasound pulses in the presence of Optison((R)) can occur Without indicators for inertial cavitation in vivo, wideband emission and extravasation. If inertial cavitation is not responsible for the BBBD, other ultrasound/rnicrobubble interactions are likely the Source. A significant increase in the emission signal due to Optison((R)) at the second and third harmonics of the ultrasound driving frequency was found to correlate with BBBD and might be useful as an online method to indicate when the disruption occurs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available