4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Impact of pregnancy on abacavir pharmacokinetics

Journal

AIDS
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 553-560

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.aids.0000210609.52836.d1

Keywords

reverse transcriptase inhibitors; pharmacokinetics; pregnancy; antiretroviral agents; HIV; AIDS; drug monitoring

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [U01 AI04189, U01 AI41089] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [N01-HD-031318-11, N01-HD-3-3365] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To describe abacavir pharmacokinetics during pregnancy and postpartum; physiological changes during pregnancy are known to affect antiretroviral drug disposition. Design: The Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group P1026s study is an on-going, prospective, non-blinded pharmacokinetic study of pregnant women receiving one or more antiretroviral drugs for routine clinical care, including a cohort receiving abacavir 300 mg twice daily. Methods: Serial plasma samples (predose, 1, 2, 4, and 6 h postdose) obtained antepartum (30-36 weeks of gestation) and again postpartum (6-12 weeks after delivery) were assayed for abacavir concentration by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Results: Antepartum evaluations were available for 25 women [mean age, 28.6 years (SD, 6); mean third-trimester weight 92 kg (SD, 35.4); and race/ethnicity 52% black, 28% Hispanic, 16% white, 4% Asian], with geometric mean abacavir area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5.9 mg.h/l [90% confidence interval (CI), 5.2-6.8] and maximum plasma concentration (C-max) of 1.9 mg/l (90% CI, 1.6-2.2). Seventeen women completed postpartum sampling, and the ratios of antepartum to postpartum AUC and C-max were 1.04 (90% CI, 0.91-1.18) and 0.79 (90% CI, 0.65-0.98), respectively. Conclusions: Abacavir AUC during pregnancy was similar to that at 6-12 weeks postpartum and to that for non-pregnant historical controls (5.8 mg.h/l). Consequently, pregnancy does not appear to affect overall abacavir exposure significantly or to necessitate dose adjustments. (C) 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available