4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Elevated blood pressure and heart rate in human renin receptor transgenic rats

Journal

HYPERTENSION
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages 552-556

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000199912.47657.04

Keywords

renin; rats, transgenic; blood pressure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, a receptor for renin was described that may be important for vascular uptake and activation of (pro) renin, thus leading to local generation of angiotensin II. To assess the in vivo relevance of this protein, we generated transgenic rats overexpressing the human renin receptor gene in smooth muscle tissue, under the control of a 16-kb fragment of the mouse smooth muscle myosin heavy chain gene [TGR(SMMHC-HRR)]. Four lines of transgenic animals were obtained. The correct pattern of expression of the transgene was confirmed by RNase protection assay and in situ hybridization. TGR(SMMHC-HRR) rats are fertile and develop normally. After 6 months of age, transgenic rats develop a cardiovascular phenotype with an elevated systolic blood pressure (137.8 +/- 5 versus 118.9 +/- 3.7 mm Hg; P = 0.008), and an augmentation in heart rate (349.1 +/- 7.7 versus 303.1 +/- 16.16 bpm; P = 0.023) in TGR(SMMHC-HRR) and controls, respectively. These alterations are progressively increasing with aging. Although kidney function and plasma renin were normal in TGR(SMMHC-HRR), an increase in plasma aldosterone [TGR(SMMHC-HRR) 428 +/- 64.9 versus 207.3 +/- 73.24 pg/mL in control; P = 0.02] and in aldosterone/renin ratio [TGR(SMMHC-HRR) 8.04 +/- 2.2 versus 2.8 +/- 0.55 in control; P = 0.03] was observed. This suggests that renin receptor overexpression has resulted in increased intraadrenal angiotensin II, thereby provoking enhanced aldosterone generation in the absence of changes in plasma renin. The rise in aldosterone may underlie, at least in part, the observed cardiovascular phenotype of TGR(SMMHC-HRR).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available