4.4 Article

Identifying cellular genes crucial for the reactivation of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus latency

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY
Volume 87, Issue -, Pages 519-529

Publisher

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.81603-0

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) is the latest addition to the long list of human herpesviruses. Reactivation of latent herpesvirus infections is still a mystery. It was demonstrated recently that the phorbol ester TPA was efficient in inducing a reactivation of KSHV infection in the S phase of the cell cycle. In the present study, flow cytometry-sorted, TPA-induced, KSHV-infected haematopoietic cells (BCBL-1) were used to analyse the expression profiles of cancer-related cellular genes in the S phase of the cell cycle compared with the GO/1 phase by using microarrays. Overall, the S phase of the cell cycle seems to provide KSHV with an apt environment for a productive lytic cycle of infection. The apt conditions include cellular signalling that promotes survivability, DNA replication and lipid metabolism, while blocking cell-cycle progression to M phase. Some of the important genes that were overexpressed during the S phase of the cell cycle compared with the GO/1 phase of TPA-induced BCBL-1 cells are v-myb myeloblastosis (MYBL2), protein kinase-membrane associated tyrosine/threonine 1 (PKMYT1), ribonucleotide reductase M1 polypeptide (RRM1) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors delta (PPARD). Inhibition of PKMYT1 expression by the use of specific short interfering RNAs significantly lowered the TPA-induced KSHV lytic cycle of infection. The significance of these and other genes in the reactivation of KSHV is discussed in the following report. Taken together, a flow cytometry-microarray-based method to study the cellular conditions critical for the reactivation of KSHV infection is reported here for the first time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available