4.4 Article

Epidemiology of pediatric mitochondrial respiratory chain disorders in northwest Spain

Journal

PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 204-211

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2005.07.011

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our knowledge of mitochondrial respiratory chain diseases has increased dramatically in recent years, but relatively little information is available about their prevalence and incidence, either in pediatric or adult patients. This study reports incidence and prevalence estimates, and summarizes the clinical, biochemical, histologic, and genetic characteristics of 51 patients age 0-16 years. The overall annual incidence of all mitochondrial respiratory chain diseases was estimated to be 1.43 cases per 105 in the population as a whole, and 2.85 cases per 105 in the under-6 population. The overall prevalence of all mitochondrial respiratory chain diseases was estimated as 7.5 cases per 105 in the under-19 population, and 8.7 cases per 105 in the under-16 population. These incidence and prevalence estimates are higher than in most previous studies of pediatric populations. Estimated prevalences of specific mitochondrial respiratory chain diseases were 2.05 cases per 105 for Leigh syndrome, 0.68 per 105 for mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid (mtDNA) deletions and deletions-duplications, 1.59 per 105 for mtDNA depletions, and 0.45 per 105 for mtDNA point mutations. Leigh syndrome was the most frequent clinical syndrome. The estimates of the prevalences of mtDNA deletions, deletion s-duplications, and point mutations set forth here are lower than in similar previous studies, whereas the estimate of the prevalence of mtDNA depletions is rather higher. Sixteen of these patients manifested phenotypic syndromes that have not been previously reported in association with mitochondrial respiratory chain diseases. (c) 2006 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available