4.2 Review

Comparative proteomics of cerebrospinal fluid in neuropathologically-confirmed Alzheimer's disease and non-demented elderly subjects

Journal

NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 155-163

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1179/016164106X98035

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; biomarkers; cerebrospinal fluid; proteomics

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG-17490, AG-19795, AG-19610] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Diagnostic tests able to reveal Alzheimer's disease (AD) in livin patients before cognitive ability is destroyed are urgently needed. Such tests must distinguish AD from other dementia causes, as well as differentiate subtle changes associated with normal aging from true pathology emergence. A single biomarker offering such diagnostic and prognostic capacities has eluded identification. Therefore, a valuable test for AD is likely to be based on a specific pattern of change in a set of proteins, rather than a single protein. Methods: We examined pooled cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples obtained from neuropathologically-confirmed AD (n = 43) and non-demented control subjects (n = 43) using 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE) proteomic methodology to detect differentially expressed proteins. Proteins exhibiting expression level differences between the pools were recovered and identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. Results: Five differentially-expressed proteins with potential roles in amyloid-beta metabolism and vascular and brain physiology [apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1), cathepsin D (CatD), hemopexin (HPX), transthyretin (TTR), and two pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) isoforms] were identified. Apo A-1, CatD and TTR were significantly reduced in the AD pool sample, while HPX and the PEDF isoforms were increased in AD CSF. Discussion: These results suggest that multi-factor proteomic pattern analysis of the CSF may provide a means to diagnose and assess AD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available