4.5 Review

Methods to assess in vitro drug release from injectable polymeric particulate systems

Journal

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 460-474

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-005-9397-8

Keywords

continuous flow; dialysis; in vitro release methods; IVIVC; microspheres; sample and separate; subcutaneous and intramuscular administration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review provides a compilation of the methods used to Study real-time (37 degrees C) drug release from parenteral microparticulate drug delivery systems administered via the subcutaneous or intramuscular route. Current methods fall into three broad categories, viz., sample and separate, flow-through cell, and dialysis techniques. The principle of the specific method employed along with the advantages and disadvantages are described. With the sample and separate technique, drug-loaded microparticles are introduced into a vessel, and release is monitored over time by analysis of Supernatant or drug remaining in the microspheres. In the flow-through cell technique, media is continuously circulated through a column containing drug-loaded microparticles followed by analysis of the eluent. The dialysis method achieves a physical separation of the drug-loaded microparticles front the release media by use of a membrane, which allows for sampling without interference of the microspheres. With all these methods, the setup and sampling techniques seem to influence in vitro released the results are discussed in detail, and criteria to aid in selection of a method are stated. Attempts to establish in vitro-in vivo correlation for these injectable dosage forms are also discussed. It Would be prudent to have ail in vitro test method for microparticles that satisfies compendial and regulatory requirements, is user friend]V, robust, and reproducible, and call be used for quality-control purposes at real-time and elevated temperatures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available