4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Distinctive clinical phenotype and treatment outcome of type 1 autoimmune hepatitis in the elderly

Journal

HEPATOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 532-538

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/hep.21074

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

\Autoimmune hepatitis is classically a disease of young women. Our aims were to determine its occurrence, clinical phenotype, and outcome in elderly patients and contrast findings to young adults. Two-hundred-and-five white North American adults with definite type I autoimmune hepatitis were grouped according to age at presentation and the groups compared. Forty-seven patients (23%) were aged >= 60 years (median age, 68 years), and 31 patients (15%) were aged <= 30 years (median age, 25 years). The patients >= 60 years had a higher frequency of cirrhosis at presentation than the patients <= 30 years (33% versus 10%, P =.03). They also had thyroid or rheumatic diseases more commonly (42% vs. 13%, P =.006). HLA DR3 occurred more frequently in the patients <= 30 years than in those >= 60 years (58% vs. 23%, P.004), and HLA DR4 occurred more often in the patients >= 60 years (47% vs. 13%, P.003). Patients aged >= 60 years failed corticosteroid treatment less commonly than those aged <= 30 years (5% vs. 24%, P =.03). Autoimmunc hepatitis occurred in patients aged 18-30 years (15%), 31-39 years (15%), 40-49 years (21%), 50-59 years (25%), and >= 60 years (23%). Differences in age distribution, HLA frequencies, and treatment outcome occurred after age 2:40 years. In conclusion, elderly patients have a greater frequency of cirrhosis at presentation and HLA DR4 than patients :530 years, and they have a lower occurrence of treatment failure. Transitions in clinical and genetic phenotypes occur after age a:40 years. Genetic susceptibilities may favor etiologic factors that are age-related.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available