4.2 Article

Effect of muscle fatigue on the sense of limb position and movement

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 170, Issue 1, Pages 30-38

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0174-z

Keywords

fatigue; vibration; muscle spindle

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have recently shown that in an unsupported forearm-matching task blindfolded human subjects are able to achieve an accuracy of 2-3 degrees. If one arm was exercised to produce significant fatigue and the matching task was repeated, it led subjects to make position-matching errors. Here that result is confirmed using fatigue from a simple weight-lifting exercise. A 30% drop in maximum voluntary force after the exercise was accompanied by a significant matching error of 1.7 degrees in the direction of extension when the reference arm had been fatigued, and 1.9 degrees in the direction of flexion when the indicator arm had been fatigued. We also tested the effect of fatigue on a simple movement tracking task where the reference forearm was moved into extension at a range of speeds from 10 to 50 degrees s(-1). Fatigue was found not to significantly reduce the movement-tracking accuracy. In a second experiment, movement tracking was measured while one arm was vibrated. When it was the reference arm, the subject perceived the movement to be significantly faster (3.7 degrees s(-1)) than it actually was. When it was the indicator, it was perceived to be slower (4.6 degrees s(-1)). The data supports the view that muscle spindles are responsible for the sense of movement, and that this sense is not prone to the disturbance from fatigue. By contrast, the sense of position can be disturbed by muscle fatigue. It is postulated, that the sense of effort experienced by holding the arm against the force of gravity is able to provide information about the position in space of the limb and that the increased effort from fatigue produces positional errors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available