4.8 Article

Particulate phosphorus bioavailability as a function of stream flow and land cover

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 1258-1268

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.01.016

Keywords

total phosphorus; particulate phosphorus; bioavailability; land cover; baseflow; storm flow; particle size

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using total phosphor-us concentrations to estimate eutrophication risk is problematic for management purposes, as only some forms of phosphorus are biologically available for phytoplankton growth. This study estimated the bioavailability of particulate phosphorus, in forested, urban, agricultural (i.e. dairy farm) and mixed land cover streams. Sixteen stream sites were sampled during base and storm flow conditions and the following parameters were determined: total suspended solids, total phosphorus, total dissolved phosphor-us, particulate phosphorus, percent bioavailable particulate phosphorus (%BAPP), total bioavailable phosphor-us and sediment particle size distribution. Algal assays with Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata were used to measure %BAPP. Percent BAPP averaged 17%, 26% and 24% for streams draining catchments with forested, mixed use and agricultural land cover, respectively, and %BAPP did not vary significantly between base and storm flow conditions in these stream types. In contrast, %BAPP averaged 73% in the urban streams during baseflows but declined to an average of only 19% during storms. Particle size distributions did not correlate with %BAPP in these samples. During storm events, particulate phosphorus concentrations increased in all streams by an average of 614% and total phosphorus increased by 200%, whereas total BAP (i.e. total dissolved phosphorus+%BAPP x particulate phosphorus) only increased by 72% because on average only 20% of the particulate phosphorus transported during these events was biologically available. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available