4.7 Review

Caveolins and the regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in the heart

Journal

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
Volume 69, Issue 4, Pages 788-797

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.12.014

Keywords

nitric oxide synthase; caveolin; endothelium; cardiac myocytes; angiogenesis; contractility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Virtually all cell types within the myocardium express caveolae, where cell-specific isoforms of caveolin both maintain the structural organisation of these cholesterol-rich of the plasmalemma and serve as scaffolds for the dynamic constitution of signalosomes, or hubs concentrating numerous transmembrane signaling proteins and their effectors. Analysis of the phenotype of mice with genetic deletion or overexpression of specific caveolin isoforms has provided key evidence for the importance of caveolins and caveolae in several aspects of the cardiovascular biology, including vascular contractility, lipid metabolism, angiogenesis, or the control of cardiac hypertrophy. Among specific protein-protein interactions involving caveolins in cardiac tissue, these genetic models unequivocally confirmed the functional importance of the dynamic association of the endothelial isoform of nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) for its post-translational regulation in endothelial cells and cardiac myocytes, which bears on the enzyme's capacity to modulate nitric oxide (NO)-dependent endothelial function, angiogenesis, and excitation-contraction coupling. We will review the current understanding of this regulation of eNOS (and potentially other NOS isoforms) through protein-protein interactions involving several G-protein-coupled receptors and other allosteric modulators in the context of emerging paradigms on the regulation of cardiac function by NO. (c) 2006 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available