4.4 Article

Common and variable contributions of Fis residues to high-affinity binding at different DNA sequences

Journal

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
Volume 188, Issue 6, Pages 2081-2095

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.188.6.2081-2095.2006

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM052051, R29 GM052051, GM52051] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fis is a nucleoid-associated protein that interacts with poorly related DNA sequences with a high degree of specificity. A difference of more than 3 orders of magnitude in apparent K-d values was observed between specific (K-d, similar to 1 to 4 nM) and nonspecific (K-d, similar to 4 mu M) DNA binding. To examine the contributions of Fis residues to the high-affinity binding at different DNA sequences, 13 alanine substitutions were generated in or near the Fis helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif, and the resulting proteins were purified. In vitro binding assays at three different Fis sites (fis P 11, hin distal, and lambda attR) revealed that R85, T87, R89, K90, and K91 played major roles in high-affinity DNA binding and that R85, T87, and K90 were consistently vital for binding to all three sites. Other residues made variable contributions to binding, depending on the binding site. N84 was required only for binding to the X attR Fis site, and the role of R89 was dramatically altered by the lambda attR DNA flanking sequence. The effects of Fis mutations on fis P 11 or hin distal site binding in vitro generally correlated with their abilities to mediate fis P repression or DNA inversion in vivo, demonstrating that the in vitro DNAbinding effects are relevant in vivo. The results suggest that while Fis is able to recognize a minimal common set of DNA sequence determinants at different binding sites, it is also equipped with a number of residues that contribute to the binding strength, some of which play variable roles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available