4.5 Article

A computational lifetime prediction of a thermal shock experiment. Part II: discussion on difference fatigue criteria

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.0983.x

Keywords

304L stainless steel; finite element; low-cycle fatigue; plasticity; thermal fatigue; thermal shock

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The SPLASH experiment has been designed in 1985 by the CEA to simulate thermal fatigue due to cooling shocks on steel specimens and is similar to the device reported by Marsh in Ref. [ 1]. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the application of different fatigue criteria in this case. The fatigue criteria: dissipated energy, Manson Coffin, Park and Nelson, dissipated energy with a pressure term, are determined for the experiment using results from FEM computations presented in the first part of the paper ( Part I)(2) and compared with results from uniaxial and multiaxial experiments from literature. The work emphasizes the evolution of the triaxiality ratio during the loading cycle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available