4.4 Article

A comparison of liquid nitrogen and liquid helium as cryogens for electron cryotomography

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
Volume 153, Issue 3, Pages 231-240

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.12.004

Keywords

electron cryomicroscopy; tomography; helium cooling; radiation damage; CryoEM

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [P01 GM66521] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The principal resolution limitation in electron cryomicroscopy of frozen-hydrated biological samples is radiation damage. It has long been hoped that cooling such samples to just a few kelvins with liquid helium would slow this damage and allow statistically better-defined images to be recorded. A new G2 Polara microscope from FEI Company was used to image various biological samples cooled by either liquid nitrogen or liquid helium to similar to 82 or similar to 12 K, respectively, and the results were compared with particular interest in the doses (10-200 e-/angstrom(2))and resolutions (3-8 nm) typical for electron cryotomography. Simple dose series revealed a gradual loss of contrast at similar to 12 K through the first several tens of e-/angstrom(2), after which small bubbles appeared. Single particle reconstructions from each image in a dose series showed no difference in the preservation of medium-resolution (3-5 nm) structural detail at the two temperatures. Tomographic reconstructions produced with total doses between 10 and 350 e-/angstrom(2) showed better results at similar to 82 K than similar to 12 K for every dose tested. Thus disappointingly, cooling with liquid helium is actually disadvantageous for cryotomography. (C) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available