4.7 Article

Testing models of supermassive black hole seed formation through gravity waves

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 639, Issue 1, Pages 7-22

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/499325

Keywords

black hole physics; cosmology : theory; dark matter; galaxies : halos; gravitational waves; quasars : general

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the gravitational wave background produced from the formation and assembly of supermassive black holes within the cosmological paradigm of hierarchical structure formation. In particular, we focus on a supermassive black hole formation scenario in which the present-day population of supermassive black holes is built from high-mass seed black holes, and we compute the concomitant spectrum of gravitational radiation produced by mergers of the seed black holes. We find that this scenario predicts a large gravitational wave background that should be resolved into individual sources with space interferometers, such as the proposed Laser Interferometric Space Antenna (LISA). The number of inspiral, merger, and ringdown events above a signal-to-noise ratio of 5 that results from massive black hole seeds is on the order of 10(3). This prediction is robust and insensitive to several of the details of the model. We conclude that an interferometer such as LISA will be able to effectively rule out or confirm a class of models in which supermassive black holes grow from high-mass seed black holes and may be able to place strong limits on the role of mergers as a channel for supermassive black hole growth. Supermassive black hole seeds likely form in the earliest protogalactic structures at high redshift, and the masses of supermassive black holes are known to be strongly correlate dwith the potentials of the spheroids in which they reside. Therefore, these results imply that space interferometers can be used as a powerful probe of the physics of galaxy formation and protogalaxy formation at very high redshift.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available