4.2 Article

Steps counts among middle school students vary with aerobic fitness level

Journal

RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages 14-22

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.5641/027013606X13080769703687

Keywords

adolescence; fitness; pedometers; physical activity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to examine if steps/day taken by middle school students varied based on aerobic fitness classification. Middle school students (N = 223; 112 girls, 111 boys) were assigned to three aerobic fitness categories (HIGH, MOD, LOW) based on results of the FITNESSGRAM PACER test. Four weekdays of pedometer monitoring determined activity Levels (steps/day). Boys accumulated significantly more steps/day than girls, 11,589 +/- 3,270 and 10, 232 +/- 2,517 steps/day, respectively; F(1,219) =16.0, p < .001, n(2) =.055. There were no differences in steps/day between grades. HIGH fit participants accumulated significantly more steps/day, F(2, 217) =.12. 2, p < .001, n(2) = 101, than moderately fit and low fit participants (approximate to 1, 491 and 2,867 steps/day, respectively). Middle school students who participated in sports in addition to physical education (PE) accumalation significantly more steps/day (approximate to 980 steps/day) than those participating in PE only, F(1, 219) = 10.0, p < .0.1, n(2) =.044. Although the relationship between physical activity and aerobic fitness was moderate (0.35; p < .01), these data demonstrated significant differences in accumulated steps/day among youth of varying aerobic fitness levels. Whether improved fitness levels were the result of additional activity or the cause of it remains to be determined. Regardless, the fittest middle school students were also the most active and accumulated a significant amount of steps/day through organized extracurricular physical activities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available