4.7 Article

Comparative effectiveness and safety of biological treatment options after tumour necrosis factor α inhibitor failure in rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review and indirect pairwise meta-analysis

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 71, Issue 8, Pages 1303-1308

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200490

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Schering-Plough
  2. Schering Plough
  3. Pfizer
  4. MSD
  5. UCB
  6. Roche
  7. Abbott
  8. BMS
  9. Celgene
  10. Centocor
  11. Novo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Optimal treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after inadequate response (IR) to tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNFi) remains uncertain. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of biological agents after TNFi-IR. Methods A systematic literature search was carried out using Medline and Cochrane databases, as well as http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, and bibliographies of the retrieved literature were searched by hand. Randomised, placebo-controlled trials that enrolled patients with RA with TNFi-IR were included and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response as primary efficacy outcome and adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and serious infections (SIs) as safety measures were extracted. An indirect meta-analysis with pairwise comparisons of efficacy and safety data was then carried out using ORs or risk differences (RDs) in a random effects model. Results In four randomised controlled trials with 24 weeks' follow-up, direct comparisons of abatacept, golimumab, rituximab and tocilizumab versus placebo showed statistically significant mean ORs of 3.3-8.9 for ACR20, 5.5-10.2 for ACR50 and 4.1-13.5 for ACR70. Risks of AEs, SAEs and SIs versus placebo were non-significant. Indirect pairwise comparisons of the four biological agents showed no significant differences in ACR50 and ACR70. Golimumab had a significantly lower OR (0.56-0.59) for ACR20 but significantly fewer AEs (RD 0.13-0.18). Efficacy after one versus multiple TNFi failures did not differ significantly between the different biological agents. Conclusion In patients refractory to one or more TNFi, new biological agents provide significant improvement with good safety. Lacking head-to-head trials, indirect meta-analysis enables a comparison of effectiveness and safety of biological agents with each other and shows that all biological agents have similar effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available