4.7 Review

The role of biosimilars in the treatment of rheumatic diseases

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 72, Issue 3, Pages 322-328

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202715

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
  2. Charite Universitatsmedisin Berlin
  3. Teva Pharmaceuticals
  4. Roche
  5. Baxter
  6. Imunomedics Inc
  7. Sanofi
  8. Takeda
  9. UCB Pharma
  10. Abbott
  11. Amgen
  12. AstraZeneca
  13. BMS
  14. Genentech/Roche
  15. GSK
  16. Janssen
  17. Lilly
  18. Merck Serono
  19. Novartis
  20. Pfizer
  21. Regeneron
  22. Roche Pfizer
  23. MSD/Schering Plough
  24. Pfizer/Wyeth
  25. Fourteen22
  26. Astra Zeneca MSD/Schering Plough
  27. UCB
  28. UCB Pharm
  29. Celgene
  30. Centocor
  31. Glaxo
  32. Medimmune
  33. MSD
  34. Novartis-Sandoz

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The first biological therapeutics in rheumatology are approaching patent expiration, encouraging development of 'follow-on' versions, known as 'biosimilars'. Biological agents range from simple replacement hormones to complex monoclonal antibodies and soluble receptors: large, intricate proteins with unique tertiary and quaternary structures that are inherently difficult to replicate. Post-translational modifications, such as glycosylation, may occur from changes in cell lines and/or manufacturing processes, resulting in products that are highly similar, but not identical, to approved 'reference' agents, hence, the term 'biosimilar', rather than 'bioidentical'. Even minor modifications in manufacturing processes, which iteratively occur with reference products due to improvements in efficiency, scale up to meet commercial demands or changes in manufacturing sites, may alter biological function and/or immunogenicity, potentially changing their safety and efficacy profile. As biosimilars are now in randomised controlled trials for treatment of rheumatic diseases, rheumatologists face decisions regarding equipoise and will need to consider their clinical use versus reference products. A clear understanding of the inherent differences between reference antibodies and biosimilars, their clinical implications and the processes governing regulation, approval and clinical use of biosimilars, is paramount. A panel of international experts in the field of rheumatology recently convened to evaluate and discuss these issues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available