3.9 Article

Thyroid hormone-regulated target genes have distinct patterns of coactivator recruitment and histone acetylation

Journal

MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 483-490

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1210/me.2005-0101

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thyroid hormone receptors (TRs) are ligand-regulated transcription factors that bind to thyroid hormone response elements of target genes. Upon ligand binding, they recruit coactivator complexes that increase histone acetylation and recruit RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to activate transcription. Recent studies suggest that nuclear receptors and coactivators may have temporal recruitment patterns on hormone response elements, yet little is known about the nature of the patterns at multiple endogenous target genes. We thus performed chromatin immunoprecipitation assays to investigate coactivator recruitment and histone acetylation patterns on the thyroid hormone response elements of four endogenous target genes (GH, sarcoplasmic endoplasmic reticulum calciumadenosine triphosphatase, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, and cholesterol 7 alpha- hydroxylase) in a rat pituitary cell line that expresses TRs. We found that TR beta\, several associated coactivators ( steroid receptor coactivator-1, glucocorticoid receptor interacting protein-1, and TR-associated protein 220), and RNA Pol II were rapidly recruited to thyroid hormone response elements as early as 15 min after T 3 addition. When the four target genes were compared, we observed differences in the types and temporal patterns of recruited coactivators and histone acetylation. Interestingly, the temporal pattern of RNA Pol II was similar for three genes studied. Our findings suggest that thyroid hormone-regulated target genes may have distinct patterns of coactivator recruitment and histone acetylation that may enable highly specific regulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available