4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Calcimimetic R-568 decreases extraosseous calcifications in uremic rats treated with calcitriol

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 795-804

Publisher

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2005040342

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Calcimimetics decrease parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels in uremic patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism without increasing serum calcium (Ca). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of calcimimetic R-568 alone or in combination with calcitriol on vascular and other soft tissue calcifications in uremic rats with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Sham-operated and 5/6 nephrectomized Wistar rats were studied. 5/6 Nephrectornized rats were treated with vehicle, calcitriol (80 ng/kg every other day), R-568 (1.5 and 3 mg/kg per d), and both calcitriol and R-568 1.5 mg/kg, as above. Rats were killed after 14 or 56 d of treatment. Blood was drawn for biochemical measurements. Aortic, heart, kidney, lung, and stomach tissue samples were processed for histopathology and measurement of tissue Ca and phosphorus content. PTH concentrations were significantly reduced by all treatments. Treatment with calcitriol induced significant vascular calcification (aortic Ca increased to 4.2 +/- 1.2 mg/g at day 14 and to 11.4 +/- 0.7 mg/g at day 56; P < 0.05 versus vehicle). Treatment with R-568 did not induce vascular calcification. Concurrent administration of R-568 with calcitriol reduced the aortic Ca (1.9 +/- 0.2 mg/g at day 14 and 7.5 +/- 1.4 mg/g at day 56) in relation to calcitriol alone. Soft tissue calcifications mirrored aortic mineralizations. Survival was significantly (P < 0.001) reduced in calcitriol-treated rats, and mortality was attenuated (P = 0.01) by concurrent treatment with R-568. In uremic rats, R-568 reduces elevated PTH levels without inducing vascular calcification, prevents calcitriol-induced vascular calcification, and decreases mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available