4.4 Article

Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S aureus in the United States, 2001-2002

Journal

ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 132-137

Publisher

ANNALS FAMILY MEDICINE
DOI: 10.1370/afm.526

Keywords

Staphylococcus aureus; cross infection; drug resistance, bacterial; community-acquired infections

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [1 P30AG021677] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE Staphylococcus aureus is a common cause of invasive infections, yet most assessments of prevalence are based on health care-based samples. We computed population-based estimates of nasal carriage of S aureus and risk factors for carriage, as well as population-based estimates of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA). METHODS We used the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001-2002 to estimate carriage of S aureus and MRSA for the non-institutionalized US population including children and adults. RESULTS An estimated 86.9 million persons (32.40% of the population) were colonized with S aureus. The prevalence of MRSA among S aureus isolates was 2.58%, for an estimated population carriage of MRSA of 0.84% or 2.2 million persons. Among individuals with S aureus isolates, individuals aged 65 years or older had the highest MRSA prevalence (8.28%). Among all the racial/ethnic groups studied, Hispanics had the highest prevalence of colonization with S aureus but, when colonized, were less likely to have MRSA. CONCLUSIONS This first nationally representative assessment of carriage of S aureus indicates that nearly one third of the population is currently colonized by this organism. Although the prevalence of MRSA remains low, more than 2.2 million people carry this resistant organism; thus, vigilance in promoting appropriate microbial transmission protocols should remain a priority.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available