4.7 Article

A double-blind clinical trial for treatment of crohn's disease by oral administration of Alequel™, a mixture of autologous colon-extracted proteins:: A patient-tailored approach

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 101, Issue 3, Pages 561-568

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00441.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of a personalized mode of treatment for Crohn's disease (CD) by oral administration of Alequel (TM), an extract of autologous colonic proteins. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with moderate to severe CD were enrolled in a 27-wk randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomized to receive either a placebo or the study drug prepared from autologous colonic extract. RESULTS: Oral administration of autologous colonic proteins resulted in clinical remission (58%vs 29%; 46.6%vs 26.6%, using an intention to treat analysis, p= NS), clinical response (67%vs 43%; 53.3%vs 40%, using an intention to treat analysis, p= NS) and improved quality of life (Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score improvement 43%vs 12%) in the drug study group, compared to placebo group. No treatment-related adverse events were noted. Only in the study-drug-treated cohort who achieved clinical remission (DR), there was a decreased number of subject-specific, antigen-directed, IFN gamma spot-forming colonies. DR subjects had a lower initial C-reactive protein level than DNOR or placebo subjects, an increased percentage of peripheral blood nature killer T cells, and an increased CD4(+)/CD8(+) T-cell ratio throughout the period of drug administration. CONCLUSIONS: Oral administration of Alequel (TM) is a safe method for treatment of patients with moderate to severe CD, and its efficacy needs to be proven. Several markers may be applicable as surrogate markers for the clinical effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available