4.7 Article

Effect of baseline rheumatoid factor and anticitrullinated peptide antibody serotype on rituximab clinical response: a meta-analysis

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 72, Issue 3, Pages 329-336

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201117

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Roche Products
  2. Amgen
  3. Biogen-Idec
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  5. Centocor
  6. Flexxion Therapeutics
  7. Genentech
  8. Johnson Johnson
  9. Pfizer
  10. Merck
  11. Proctor Gamble
  12. MRC [G1001518] Funding Source: UKRI
  13. Medical Research Council [G1001518] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10299] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. Versus Arthritis
  16. Cancer Research UK [18475] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Studies examining the relationship between serological status (rheumatoid factor and/or anticitrullinated antibody) and rituximab treatment outcome in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been hampered by limited numbers of seronegative patients. Objective To carry out a meta-analysis of trials from the rituximab RA clinical programme to investigate this relationship further. Methods This was a meta-analysis of four placebo-controlled, phase II or III clinical trials. The efficacy end point in all analyses was change from baseline in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) at 24 weeks. Assay of serotype and missing data imputation methods were consistent across all studies. Results The population analysed comprised 2177 patients (rituximab, n=1416; placebo, n=761). Demographics and baseline disease characteristics were well balanced. When a fixed-effects meta-analysis approach was used, the overall-effect model indicated evidence of additional treatment benefit with rituximab in seropositive patients: reduction in DAS28-ESR at week 24 was on average 0.35 units (95% CI 0.12 to 0.84; n=1394) greater than in seronegative patients; this effect was not seen in placebo patients. Heterogeneity indices indicated significant uncertainty in the overall-effect model (Q=8.8, I=0.77; p=0.03 (chi(2) test)). Baseline Health Assessment Questionnaire score, pain visual analogue scale, swollen joint counts of 28 joints and race were significant contributors to this heterogeneity, with additional analysis indicating that these effects may predominate in early RA (methotrexate-naive) populations. A dominant effect was seen in patients for whom one or more tumour necrosis factor inhibitors had failed. Conclusion Although the difference was modest, the overall-effect model indicates that seropositive patients respond better to rituximab than seronegative patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available