4.7 Article

American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Provisional Definition of Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis for Clinical Trials

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 70, Issue 3, Pages 404-413

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2011.149765

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. American College of Rheumatology
  2. European League Against Rheumatism
  3. NIH [AR-47785]
  4. Amgen
  5. Abbott
  6. Centocor
  7. Schering-Plough
  8. Wyeth
  9. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  10. Roche
  11. UCB
  12. AstaZeneca
  13. Crescendo Biosciences
  14. Biogen Idec
  15. Pfizer
  16. Actelion
  17. Schering
  18. Genentech
  19. Gilead
  20. GlaxoSmithKline
  21. Merck
  22. Nitec
  23. Novartis
  24. Xoma
  25. Sharp
  26. Dohme
  27. Affinergy
  28. AstraZeneca
  29. Abraxis
  30. Alpha Rx
  31. Nuvo/Dimethaid Research
  32. PLx Pharma
  33. Hisamitsu
  34. Dr Reddys
  35. Avanir
  36. Cerimon
  37. Alimera
  38. Paraexel
  39. Bayer
  40. Rigel
  41. Chelsea, Regeneron
  42. Cypress Biosciences
  43. Nicox
  44. Biocryst
  45. Extera
  46. Solace
  47. Puretech-ventures
  48. White Mountain Pharma
  49. Omeros
  50. Jazz
  51. Takeda
  52. Teva
  53. Zydus
  54. Proprius
  55. Alder
  56. Cephalon
  57. Seprecor
  58. Purdue
  59. EMD Merck Se- rono
  60. Altea
  61. Talagen
  62. TiGenix
  63. Antigenics
  64. Forest
  65. Genzyme
  66. CaloSyn
  67. King
  68. Pozen, IL Pharma
  69. Analgesic Solutions
  70. US WorldMeds
  71. Savient
  72. Horizon
  73. Leerink Swann
  74. Luxor
  75. Nomura
  76. Fidelity
  77. Chelsea
  78. Aventis
  79. Biomatrix
  80. Cigna
  81. Parke Davis
  82. Rhone-Poulenc
  83. Sandoz
  84. SmithKline Beecham

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an increasingly attainable goal, but there is no widely used definition of remission that is stringent but achievable and could be applied uniformly as an outcome measure in clinical trials. This work was undertaken to develop such a definition. Methods A committee consisting of members of the American College of Rheumatology, the European League Against Rheumatism, and the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Initiative met to guide the process and review prespecified analyses from RA clinical trials. The committee requested a stringent definition (little, if any, active disease) and decided to use core set measures including, as a minimum, joint counts and levels of an acute-phase reactant to define remission. Members were surveyed to select the level of each core set measure that would be consistent with remission. Candidate definitions of remission were tested, including those that constituted a number of individual measures of remission (Boolean approach) as well as definitions using disease activity indexes. To select a definition of remission, trial data were analysed to examine the added contribution of patient-reported outcomes and the ability of candidate measures to predict later good radiographic and functional outcomes. Results Survey results for the definition of remission suggested indexes at published thresholds and a count of core set measures, with each measure scored as 1 or less (eg, tender and swollen joint counts, C reactive protein (CRP) level, and global assessments on a 0-10 scale). Analyses suggested the need to include a patient-reported measure. Examination of 2-year follow-up data suggested that many candidate definitions performed comparably in terms of predicting later good radiographic and functional outcomes, although 28-joint Disease Activity Score-based measures of remission did not predict good radiographic outcomes as well as the other candidate definitions did. Given these and other considerations, we propose that a patient's RA can be defined as being in remission based on one of two definitions: (1) when scores on the tender joint count, swollen joint count, CRP (in mg/dl), and patient global assessment (0-10 scale) are all <= 1, or (2) when the score on the Simplified Disease Activity Index is <= 3.3. Conclusion We propose two new definitions of remission, both of which can be uniformly applied and widely used in RA clinical trials. The authors recommend that one of these be selected as an outcome measure in each trial and that the results on both be reported for each trial.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available