4.7 Article

Sperm cryopreservation in oncological patients:: a 14-year follow-up study

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 85, Issue 3, Pages 640-645

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.022

Keywords

cancer; sperm bank; cryopreservation; infertility; chemotherapy; assisted reproduction technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Oncologic treatments can destroy spermatogenic dividing cells and cause azoospermia which could be irreversible. Sperm banking is the best option to preserve male fertility after these treatments. It is easy, inexpensive, and safe. To date, few clinical data are available about large series of cancer patients. Our objective was to determine the usefulness of these preventive sperm freezing protocols. Design: Prospective study. Setting: University-affiliated private fertility center. Patient(s): One hundred eighty-six cancer patients who banked sperm samples at our center before surgery or chemo- or radiotherapy treatments from 1991 to 2004. Intervention(s): Conjugal status, age, type of cancer, treatment, and future use (if any) of the cryopreserved sperm samples for assisted reproduction technology (ART), and cycle results were recorded, analyzed, and compared with a control group. Main Outcome Measure(s): Basic sperm analysis of semen samples from cancer patients prior to freezing, after thawing, and after capacitation for ART. Result(s): A total of 320 semen samples were frozen before antineoplasic treatment. Six months later, 27% of the males recovered normal sperm production. From all frozen samples, 8.7% were discarded; the reasons were pregnancy achievement (55%), normal sperm production (28%), and patient death (18%). Finally, 5 IUI cycles and 30 ICSI cycles were done from frozen samples, with 1 and 15 pregnancies, respectively; results were comparable with those obtained in a control group. Conclusion(s): A significant number of males who cryopreserved semen samples before receiving antitumoral treatments have employed them. The results obtained showed that this is the strategy of choice, aiming to preserve fertility for the future, because the cost/benefit ratio is favorable. Patients should be counseled accordingly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available