4.7 Article

Identifying patients with axial spondyloarthritis in primary care: how useful are items indicative of inflammatory back pain?

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 70, Issue 10, Pages 1782-1787

Publisher

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2011.151167

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Abbott, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The value of clinical items defining inflammatory back pain to identify patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) in primary care is unclear. Objective To identify predictive clinical parameters for a diagnosis of axial SpA in patients with chronic back pain presenting in primary care. Methods Consecutive patients aged < 45 years (n=950) with back pain for > 2 months who presented to orthopaedic surgeons (n=143) were randomised based on four key questions for referral to rheumatologists (n= 36) for diagnosis. Results The rheumatologists saw 322 representative patients (mean age 36 years, 50% female, median duration of back pain 30 months). 113 patients (35%) were diagnosed as axial SpA (62% HLA B27+), 47 (15%) as ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and 66 (21%) as axial non-radiographic SpA (nrSpA). Age at onset = 35 years, improvement by exercise, improvement with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, waking up in the second half of the night and alternating buttock pain were identified as most relevant for diagnosing axial SpA by multiple regression analysis. Differences between AS and nrSpA were detected. No single item was predictive, but = 3 items proved useful for good sensitivity and specificity by receiver operating characteristic modelling. Conclusion This study shows that a preselection in primary care of patients with back pain based on a combination of clinical items is useful to facilitate the diagnosis of axial SpA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available