4.7 Article

Delays in assessment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: variations across Europe

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 70, Issue 10, Pages 1822-1825

Publisher

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2011.151902

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. European Community
  2. Internal Grant Agency of the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic [NR 10065-4]
  3. Medical Research Council [G9818340B] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Versus Arthritis [18547] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective The first 3 months after symptom onset represent an important therapeutic window for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study investigates the extent and causes of delay in assessment of patients with RA in eight European countries. Method Data on the following levels of delay were collected from 10 centres (Berlin, Birmingham, Heraklion, Lund, Prague, Stockholm, Umea, Vienna, Warsaw and Zurich): (1) from onset of RA symptoms to request to see healthcare professional (HCP); (2) from request to see HCP to assessment by that HCP; (3) from initial assessment by HCP to referral to rheumatologist; and (4) from referral to rheumatologist to assessment by that rheumatologist. Results Data were collected from 482 patients with RA. The median delay across the 10 centres from symptom onset to assessment by the rheumatologist was 24 weeks, with the percentage of patients seen within 12 weeks of symptom onset ranging from 8% to 42%. There were important differences in the levels underlying the total delays at individual centres. Conclusions This research highlights the contribution of patients, professionals and health systems to treatment delay for patients with RA in Europe. Although some centres have strengths in minimising certain types of delay, interventions are required in all centres to ensure timely treatment for patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available